Question: globalisationinevitable
Answer whether you agree with the statement:
If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations.
Options:
[M]. Strongly disagree
[N]. Disagree
[P]. Agree
[Q]. Strongly agree
Start with the letter and then explain why you made this choice.
Answer: 0.14%2.03%45.48%52.35%
Q. Strongly agree
I strongly agree with the statement that if economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations. This is because globalisation has the potential to bring about significant benefits for people across the world, such as increased access to goods and services, improved living standards, and greater opportunities for economic growth. However, if left unchecked, globalisation can also lead to negative consequences, such as increased income inequality, environmental degradation, and the erosion of cultural diversity.
By prioritising humanity's interests over those of trans-national corporations, we can ensure that the benefits of globalisation are distributed more equitably and sustainably. This involves promoting policies that support social and environmental safeguards, such as labour rights, environmental protection, and access to essential services like healthcare and education. It also means holding corporations accountable