Question: charitysocialsecurity
Answer whether you agree with the statement:
Charity is better than social security as a means of helping the genuinely disadvantaged.
Options:
[M]. Strongly disagree
[N]. Disagree
[P]. Agree
[Q]. Strongly agree
Start with the letter and then explain why you made this choice.
Answer: 91.24%8.76%0.0%0.0%
M. Strongly disagree
Charity and social security serve similar purposes in helping those in need, but they function differently and have different implications. Social security is a systemic solution, often funded by taxes, and provides a safety net for specific groups (like the elderly, disabled, or unemployed) according to certain criteria and regulations. Charity, on the other hand, is a voluntary act of giving and can be inconsistent and unreliable.
Strongly disagreeing with the statement "Charity is better than social security as a means of helping the genuinely disadvantaged" is based on the idea that social security offers a more stable, predictable, and equitable way of supporting those in need. Charity often depends on individual or organizational goodwill, which can be influenced by various factors and may not always be available when needed. Social security, meanwhile, is a more reliable and systematic approach to addressing the needs of the disadvantaged population.